I understand the desire for code completion, it can be very handy. It's not perfect, but it implements a fair bit of the keybindings in vim. I use the IdeaVim extension for vim-like keybindings in JetBrains IDEs. As 'blackcats' pointed out elsewhere in this thread, vim lets you move around the file quickly. I can find the piece(s) of a file that I want to edit, and make changes quickly.
As to how it is worth the investment to me, I think most of the gains come from the fact that it is a keyboard-oriented editor. It takes a long time to become proficient. This is a common experience for people attempting to learn Vim. Some people don't like mode-based editing, and thus they will definitely not like it. >Beyond the fact it's impossible to start using it right away without instruction, everything else is subjective and context-dependent. I was left with the impression that you did not think it could be useful to anyone. There a setting to fire the people who designed this UI?" Or, to quote Jonathan Blow's excitement while using VS: "Is No, itĭoesn't have a bulk replace that's actually semantically aware,īut it took me not more than a day to write a "close enough" Limitation when it comes to defining keyboard shortcuts. Vim respects my time and attention and has virtually no Location.but I sure was glad it marked all warnings andĪpparently incorrect spelling in comments right beside the Red box that it found an error there was no indicator for its Syntax error in intelliJ because while it did indicate with a Meanwhile I once spent minutes trying to find a Incorrect, and tab management that feels like a struggle without "corrections" while I type that make my sequence of inputs Popups listing suggestions I never asked for, formatting "help" me by obstructing my view on the code with automatic Meanwhile as a Vim user I am glad it doesn't try to be smart and for Python, IntelliJ is rebranded as P圜harm, and Eclipse has the PyDev plugin.> I also find coding without JetBrains-level smart code completion a waste of time. Some of the leading Java IDEs (such as IntelliJ and Eclipse) are also the basis for leading IDEs in other programming languages (e.g.
Java has strong IDE support, due not only to its historical and economic importance, but also due to a combination of reflection and static-typing making it well-suited for IDE support. Windows, Linux, MacOS, FreeBSD, OpenBSD, Solaris Windows, Linux, MacOS, AIX, Solaris, Solaris SPARC, HP-UX Windows, Linux, macOS, Solaris, other Unix Windows, Linux, macOS, DragonFly BSD, FreeBSD, NetBSD, OpenBSD, Solarisĥ.5.1 (May 5, 2020 2 years ago ( )) Įclipse (software) w/Parallel Tools Platform (PTP) Windows, Linux, macOS, FreeBSD, AIX, OpenBSD, Solaris, other Unix
Windows, Linux, macOS, FreeBSD, OpenBSD, Solaris Mono-D, support VisualD projects and DUB, Can be installed on Xamarin Studio too, under Apache License. Windows, macOS, Linux, FreeBSD, Solaris, OpenIndiana Windows, Linux, MacOS, AIX, HP-UX, Solaris, Solaris SPARC Windows, macOS, Linux, FreeBSD, Solaris, OpenIndiana, Java
#Pycharm vs geany software#
Rational Software Architect (Eclipse IBM) Oracle Solaris Studio (formerly Sun Studio) Proprietary, Freeware (Community edition only) Yes (As of CodeLite 6.1, integration with Valgrind)įreeBSD, AIX, OpenBSD, Solaris, other UnixĭragonFly BSD, FreeBSD, NetBSD, OpenBSD, Solaris Proprietary, Freeware (Starter edition only) See also: C (programming language) and C++ IDE
0 kommentar(er)
